Literacy Level and Executive Control in Healthy Older Peruvian Adults.

Introduction: Early-life educational experiences are associated with cognitive performance in aging. Early literacy seems to improve executive control mechanisms, however, it is not clear whether early education would still be an advantage in countries like Peru, where access to and quality of education is highly variable. Aim: Our objective was to analyze the association of literacy level with executive control factors. Method: We evaluated 93 healthy older adults with a clinical protocol that included the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Geriatric Depression Scale and Global Dementia Staging. We also used a neuropsychological executive function battery which included the Trail-Making Test parts A and B, the Stroop Test, phonological and semantic verbal fluency tasks, Forward and Backward Digits, Numbers and Letters of the Wechsler Scale, and the Go/No-Go task. We used a principal component analysis for the dimensional reduction of the variables. To measure the level of literacy we used the word accentuation test (WAT). Results: We observed statistically significant correlations between the principal components (PCs) of working memory, cognitive flexibility and inhibitory control with the WAT scores. Furthermore, we observed that processing speed and WAT predict the scores on PCs factors better than years of education and age. Conclusions: Literacy level correlates more closely with better cognitive performance than years of education and thus, might improve executive control factors that could compensate and protect against brain changes in cognitive decline and dementia.

Diferencias en tareas de función ejecutiva entre adolescentes y adultos mayores bilingües y monolingües / Differences in Executive Function between Bilingual and Monolingual Teenagers and Older Adults

Resumen Nos propusimos comparar el rendimiento en tareas de función ejecutiva entre adolescentes y adultos mayores bilingües y monolingües. Utilizamos un diseño comparativo transversal. Evaluamos a 48 personas monolingües (24 adolescentes y 24 adultos mayores) y 56 bilingües (31 adolescentes y 25 adultos mayores) con una amplia batería neuropsicológica que comprendían tareas de flexibilidad cognitiva (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test), control inhibitorio (test de Stroop), memoria de trabajo (subescalas de Retención de dígitos, Secuencia de números y letras: test Wechsler de inteligencia) y acceso a la memoria a largo plazo (fluidez semántica y fonológica). Nuestros resultados indican que los adolescentes y adultos mayores monolingües rinden mejor en las pruebas de control ejecutivo que sus pares bilingües, siendo estas diferencias menores en los adultos mayores y no parecen asociarse a la edad y a la frecuencia de uso de L1 (castellano) y L2 (quechua). Estos resultados muestran que durante la adolescencia hay una desventaja a nivel ejecutivo en las personas bilingües, la cual parece disminuir en la adultez. Se discuten los resultados a la luz del peso de los factores socioculturales y a la posibilidad de entender al bilingüismo como un mecanismo ligado a la reserva cognitiva.

Abstract Our purpose was to compare performance in executive function tasks between bilingual and monolingual adolescents and older adults. A cross-sectional design was used. We evaluated 48 monolinguals (24 adolescents and 24 older adults) and 56 bilinguals (31 adolescents and 25 older adults) with a wide neuropsychological battery that included tasks of cognitive flexibility (Wisconsin card sorting test), inhibitory control (Stroop test), working memory (direct and inverse digits) and access to long-term memory (semantic and phonological fluency). Our results indicate that monolingual adolescents and older adults perform better in executive control tests than their bilingual counterparts, and these differences are minor in bilingual older adults, these differences do not seem to be associated with age and the frequency of use of L1 (Spanish) and L2 (Quechua). These results seem to show that during adolescence there is a cognitive disadvantage in executive function, which is reduced when people get older. The results are discussed considering sociocultural factors and the possibility of understanding bilingualism as a mechanism linked to cognitive reserve.

Afectación Neuropsicológica de la Función Ejecutiva en Pacientes con Insuficiencia Renal Crónica / Neuropsychological Impairment of Executive Function in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure

Resumen Objetivos: Analizar las diferencias en el rendimiento neuropsicológico de las funciones ejecutivas en pacientes tratados con Diálisis Peritoneal (DP) y Hemodiálisis (HD), además de valorar el nivel de afectación de las modalidades de tratamiento (DP vs HD) y las variables demográficas y clínicas sobre la respuesta cognitiva. Método: Estudio de corte transversal con muestreo no probabilístico que incluyó a 40 pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica (IRC), divididos en dos grupos: 20 pacientes sometidos a DP y 20 a HD. Se utilizó una batería de pruebas neuropsicológicas que incluyeron El Test de Palabras y Colores de STROOP, la parte B del Trail Making Test (TMT), la Torre de Hanoi y el subtest de Dígitos Inversos de la Escala Wechsler; además de un cuestionario sobre variables clínicas y demográficas. Resultados: Se evidenciaron diferencias significativas en el número de errores del TMT B y el número de movimientos de la Torre de Hanoi, siendo los pacientes sometidos a DP quienes rindieron mejor que los pacientes sometidos a HD. Por otra parte, los años de escolaridad y la edad de los pacientes parecen tener un efecto significativo sobre el rendimiento en las pruebas neuropsicológicas utilizadas. Conclusiones: Los pacientes sometidos a DP tienen un mejor rendimiento en pruebas de función ejecutiva, pero dicho rendimiento es modulado por los años de escolaridad y la edad. Se discute el papel de la escolarización y la edad sobre el rendimiento neuropsicológico y las posibles causas de las diferencias encontradas en los grupos evaluados.

Abstract Objectives: Analyze differences in neuropsychological performance of executive functions in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD) and hemodialysis (HD), and to assess the level of impact of treatment modalities (HD vs PD) and the demographic and clinical variables over cognitive function. Materials and methods: Cross-sectional study with non-probability sampling that included 40 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) divided into two groups, 20 patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis and 20 in hemodialysis. It was used a battery of neuropsychological tests including test Stroop words and colors, Part B of the Trail Making Test (TMT), Tower of Hanoi, and indirect Digit subtest of the Wechsler scale; and a questionnaire on demographic and clinical variables. Results: Significant differences were found in the number of errors of TMT B and the number of movements of the Tower of Hanoi, with the PD patients who performed better than patients undergoing HD. Moreover, years of schooling and the age of patients appear to have a significant effect on performance in the neuropsychological tests used. Conclusions: Patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis have better performance on executive function tests, but this performance is modulated by the years of schooling and age. It is discussed the role of schooling and age on neuropsychological performance and possible causes of the differences in the evaluated groups.